Share This Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, May 8, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To former state Sen. Jane Orie. Released from prison in February after serving time for her public corruption conviction, she's now attempting to rehabilitate her public image. Sayeth she, in an interview with WTAE: “I think politics is a dirty, dirty sport.” A jury of her peers said she resembles that remark.

Lance: To Nick Futules. Allegheny County Council's vice president let the “F”-word fly not once but twice in the heat of this week‘s debate over the Deer Lakes Park drilling lease. He also walked out of the meeting with a finger to his head and making the “crazy” motion. It's classless behavior by the Valley's council representative. He should know better but obviously does not.

On the “Watch List”: The Springdale library tax referendum. Voters have a chance to learn about a proposed 0.25-mill property tax to support the Springdale Free Public Library at a town hall meeting Tuesday at the Springdale Veterans Association on Pittsburgh Street. The question will be on the May 20 ballot in Springdale Borough and Township, Cheswick and Harmar. Learn — decide — vote.

Lance: To Westmoreland County's judge shortage. The county bench is facing three judge retirements and may not get any relief until the 2015 elections. There are only two judges hearing criminal cases, not the usual four. And the governor's office says there are no plans to temporarily fill the vacancies. So rather than address and fix a problem in plain sight, the course of action is ... none.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.