Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, May 12, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Fanning prison's opposition: Opponents of Fayette County's controversial $32 million prison plan aren't happy with their treatment by the county's Zoning Hearing Board and with good reason. Those who packed a recent session were told the board could take up to 45 days to render a decision. And, indeed, many attendees left when the board called an executive session on an unrelated matter and suggested that a decision on the prison wasn't imminent. Then the board approved the prison's special exception. Taxpayers don't deserve this subterfuge.

Bike-route mapping: As the weather warms, expect to see a lot more bicyclists on local roads. Coordinating routes along with funding to make these activities “safe, convenient and attractive” is the Westmoreland County Bike and Pedestrian Committee, which recently conducted it first meeting in Latrobe. Countians are encouraged to report road hazards and other concerns to make biking and walking safer. It's a worthwhile initiative that should go the distance.

What the hey?: Lots of words and phrases come to mind as the Pittsburgh Penguins prepare for their do-or-die seventh game against the New York Rangers on Tuesday night at Consol Energy Center. “Choke” best describes blowing a commanding 3-1 lead in the series. And “clean house” likely is what will — and should — happen if the Pens don't advance to the Eastern Conference finals. Penguin Nation is keeping its webbed feet crossed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.