The Department of Veterans Affairs, now under siege nationwide for redefining dysfunctional bureaucracy and government lying, has spent nearly half-a-billion dollars solely on office makeovers under the Obama administration, reports The Washington Free Beacon. That included nearly $383,000 for window shades in Pittsburgh, installed in January as the VA was embroiled in a scandal over how it handled a fatal outbreak of Legionnaires' disease. Has the VA no shame? ... Writing in Investor's Business Daily, Scott Powell says the real goal of the Obama administration's more stringent clean air regulations is to give the government more direct control of yet another part of the economy. “After successfully bringing more than 30 percent of the U.S. economy — the healthcare and financial services industries — under political control during the first term,” President Obama now wants 10.5 percent more, says Mr. Powell, a senior fellow at Seattle's Discovery Institute. It truly is the kind of behavior that foments revolutions. ... California Gov. Jerry Brown says climate-cluckers' predicted 4-foot rise in sea level would force the multibillion-dollar relocation of Los Angeles International Airport. LAX indeed is bordered by the Pacific Ocean. But given its elevation ranges from 108 feet to 126 feet above sea level, this is one bogus threat. A gubernatorial spokesman told the Los Angeles Times that Mr. Brown “misspoke.” That's one way to put it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.