Saturday essay: Garden scars
Ah, how easy it is to forget how much fun it is to work with chicken wire.
The plan to expand from six to seven the number of raised garden beds surrounding the greenhouse grew to eight this month. And the location changed. Originally to be sited on a lower terrace, it turned out there wasn't enough room to place an 8-foot-by-4-foot bed. Not only would the bed, and its necessary fencing to ward off critters, have made the terrace impossible to mow, the dogs would have lost their favorite place of “business.”
But a harsh winter that collided with a brainstorm in a rainstorm led to a better plan — to a fault.
The ivy on the steep slope between the driveway and the top of the terrace wall had turned from its wonderful perennial green into a dead-as-a-doornail brown. Mother Nature inadvertently unmasked some valuable real estate, albeit with the help of some excavation.
And while it proved to be the perfect spot for two 8-foot-by-2-foot beds, it presented a fencing challenge — woefully little room to maneuver to install that dastardly chicken wire.
For the uninitiated, working with this flimsy galvanized wire, even when cut to size, is like working with a writhing and scratching cat. It flips, flaps and flops around and punches through the best shirt and glove protection.
Yes, the additional growing space will be nice, as the extra produce — and the scars — will remind.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Western Psych grand jury report: Do the right thing
- The Thursday wrap
- Calling out Russia: But weakly
- Palmer v. District of Columbia: Upholding the 2nd Amendment
- Digitized medical records: They’ve become an unsecured threat