Share This Page

Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes

| Monday, May 12, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Whose fault?: The Freeport Area School District's plan to construct a $30 million middle school still can't pass Buffalo Township's muster. The Buffalo planning commission noted what it called “major deficiencies” in the district's engineering plans. The school board has complained it can't understand why the planning commission hasn't approved the proposal. Maybe the board ought to ask its engineering firm why the commission hasn't approved the plan.

Leechburg Area's future: The school district has a new superintendent, Ian Magness. We noted Mr. Magness has a master's degree in “educational leadership.” With that training, we hope he leads Leechburg toward its inevitable merger with another district. One of Magness' priorities should be to contact his counterparts at Kiski Area, Apollo-Ridge and Armstrong to discuss the near future.

What the hey?: Lots of words and phrases come to mind as the Pittsburgh Penguins prepare for their do-or-die seventh game against the New York Rangers on Tuesday night at Consol Energy Center. “Choke” best describes blowing a commanding 3-1 lead in the series. And “clean house” likely is what will — and should — happen if the Pens don't advance to the Eastern Conference finals. Penguin Nation is keeping its webbed feet crossed.

Good luck!: The WPIAL baseball and softball playoffs have started, and the Alle-Kiski Valley is well represented. Look for the Deer Lakes girls to win the title.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.