Greensburg Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To a district judge's resolve. Robert William Rearick, 27, of Greensburg, was none too happy with his bond, set at $100,000, after his arrest for allegedly participating in a drug-peddling operation from an Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital room. But as DJ James Albert has explained to this and other defendants, heroin “is a detriment to society.” And those accused of dealing it aren't going to get a fast pass back to the streets.
Lance: To the mounting Monsour Medical Center tab. A contractor has bid more than $22,000 to secure the ramshackle former hospital building, which will be paid from a $65,000 state grant originally intended for an unrealized recreation center in Jeannette. Had the building's delinquent owners been compelled to secure it eight years ago when the hospital closed, instead of walking away free and clear, this money wouldn't be coming out of the public's pocket.
Laurel: To Hannah Schade. A serious medical diagnosis would turn most patients' attention inward. But Hannah, 10, of North Huntingdon, recently diagnosed with Type I diabetes, is turning her attention outward. Recently she helped organize a fundraiser for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Says Hannah, “I don't want any other kids or their families to have to go through what I do.” Here's to a remarkable little girl and her determination to make a difference.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.