Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
Lance: To James “Lutzo” Ameris. This career thug was the No. 2 player in the murder of Lower Burrell police Off. Derek Kotecki in 2011. Ameris once possessed the pistol used to shoot Kotecki and drove the killer, Charlie Post, to the Lower Burrell Dairy Queen where the ambush occurred. Ameris faces sentencing in July on gun and drug charges. We hope Westmoreland County Judge Richard McCormick Jr. throws the proverbial book at him.
Lance: To Springdale Councilman Gene Polsinelli. The borough is broke and doesn't have enough police officers, so what's Polsinelli doing? Angling to get an officer fired in a situation that will surely result in an expensive lawsuit. Off. Amanda Duncan is required to live in the borough. She's purchased a home she's renovating and received a time extension to move to town. Not good enough, says wannabe police chief Polsinelli, who unilaterally canceled the extension. Duncan isn't the problem here; Polsinelli is.
Laurel: To John Masarik. Sylvan Pool in Harrison celebrates its 50th year this summer and Masarik has served as the club's manager for every one of them. He's also mentored hundreds of youth lifeguards and other employees. On June 21, Sylvan will honor Masarik, who is still going strong at age 90. He's wholly deserving.
On the “Watch List”: The NexTier/Farmers & Merchants banks merger. The Kittanning-based Farmers and Merchants is as close to an old-style hometown bank as there is these days. We hope it retains that feel.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.