The Thursday wrap
ISIS terrorists have made it quite clear, in word and in deed, that they are bent on exterminating Iraq's Shiite population. And the United Nations, ever more the irrelevant world body, responds with a wet noodle by urging the terrorist murderers to “respect international law.” What's next, naming ISIS to the U.N.'s Human Rights Council? ... A New York state senator has introduced legislation that would give illegal aliens the right to vote in state and local elections. Illegals would have to prove that they had lived in The Empire State and paid state taxes for three years. The bill also would allow illegals to apply for tuition assistance, health insurance and drivers's and professional licenses, reports The Daily Caller. So, why aspire to U.S. citizenship when you can be effectively handed what legal immigrants had to earn? ... Not to be outdone, the Obama administration, whose nod-nod, wink-wink immigration policies only encouraged the current flood of child illegals crossing our southern border, this week honored 10 youngsters who entered the United States illegally as “success stories.” Which, of course, only will encourage more illegals to come here. ... A new Department of Health and Human Services report documents just how large the taxpayer subsidies are for insurance secured in the “Affordable” Care Act's “marketplace.” On average, those subsides lowered premiums by 76 percent. The same report also shows premium costs for policies secured through ObamaCare health exchanges typically are higher than truly private-market plans. Ah, “progressivism.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.