TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Trying Ahmed Abu Khatalla: A military tribunal is the only appropriate venue

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

First, all due kudos to those responsible for the capture, albeit tardily, of the terrorist thug suspected of directing the deadly Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Thanks to the intrepid work of Delta Force commandos and the FBI, a very bad actor is in American custody. The days of Ahmed Abu Khatalla sipping tea at his mother's house, entertaining the inquiries of Western journalists and publicly mocking the United States appear to be over. Or, when it comes to the latter, maybe not.

What's far from over is the debate about what Mr. Abu Khatalla is. Is he a civilian criminal who, as the Obama administration once again is planning, should be tried in our civilian criminal justice system and, in the process, handed a valuable propaganda tool? Or is he an enemy combatant, as more than a few veteran prosecutors contend, and a transnational terrorist, as others more adroitly characterize him, who should be tried by a military tribunal?

By definition, Abu Khatalla is the latter. As Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the former prosecutor leading a House committee's investigation into the Benghazi attack, succinctly put it, “A non-U.S. citizen who committed a crime outside of the United States in what can only be defined as an act of terror tantamount more to a war than a criminal code violation puts me in the camp of arguing for a noncivilian court trial.”

The venue question should be moot. That it isn't not only suggests that the Obama administration seeks its own propaganda pedestal but that it continues to fail to understand the true nature of the war Islamofascists are waging.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Saturday essay: Seeding next year
  2. Reforming immigration: Raise the bar
  3. More than just mums in Connellsville
  4. Fresh produce solution
  5. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  6. The Iranian deal: Mortal blessings
  7. U.N. Watch: More propaganda
  8. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  9. The DHS crackdown
  10. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances