Senior Obama administration officials privately told senators last week that “the White House did not anticipate and was not prepared for the rise of” ISIS, the terrorist group now running roughshod over Iraq. Americans should be scared to death about what else Mr. Obama has not anticipated and is not prepared for. ... The Washington Post reports that immigration reform is “effectively dead” until President Obama leaves office. Which begs this huge question: Is the president going to continue to ignore immigration laws on the books and further harm the United States and illegal aliens alike? .... A new 30-year deal between Philadelphia's mass-transit agency and the City of Philadelphia absolves SEPTA of nearly $22 million in unpaid property taxes and any future taxes on commercial property it controls. The Philadelphia Inquirer says that's despite a 2003 state Supreme Court ruling that said it must pay taxes on such properties. As we like to say, that's no way to run a railroad. ... Milk consumption might be down in the United States but butter consumption has skyrocketed to levels not seen since World War II, reports The Wall Street Journal. Evolving theories about the health effects of saturated fats (found in butter) versus trans fats (found in margarines) appear to be fueling the switch. And the explosion in gourmet cooking is cited as well. It's about time somebody validated those mashed potatoes whipped with two sticks of butter, that city chicken roasted in one stick of butter and those fresh wax beans simmered in a half stick of butter. Ahem.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.