Summertime blues: A little optimism helps in Armstrong County
Summertime, and the livin' isn't easy in the Armstrong County region.
A hard winter and wet spring nearly kept strawberries from showing up in time at the Smicksburg festival held in their honor a bit before the summer solstice. And when some were found in the 11th hour by festival organizers, they didn't come cheap.
Thunderstorms crashed the Waves of Thunder fundraising party in Kittanning in June.
It looks like it will be another year of Allegheny River locks being mostly closed to recreational boaters. The Citizens Bridge is draped in tarps and looks more like an giant sofa in storage than the iconic landmark it is. Downtown streets and sidewalks are in the ugly stage of Kittanning's revitalization project.
These circumstances surely aren't attracting tourists or helping businesses. It's yet to be seen what effect they will have on the many events coming up in and around Riverfront Park this summer.
All we can do is struggle through summer with an eye focused on the future. One day our bridge will look like new. Kittanning's downtown will be spruced up and attractive once again. It also looks like the hard work of the Allegheny River Development Corp. is going to pay off with the reopening of our locks.
This is Armstrong County's future.
One of these mornings — hopefully by next year — we're going to rise up singing.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Arneson firing: Legally dubious
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- The Box
- A hunting question: A Pennsylvania proposal to limit the game that mentored youth hunters can take appears to be a solution in search of a problem
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion