ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, June 30, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Down the drain: Judging from a recent Unity supervisors meeting, there's no lack of interest in the use of a 10-acre Marguerite park. And yet nobody thought to turn off the water to the restrooms in wintertime, costing $1,600 to replace water pipes. That's money down the drain because, by all indications, responsibility for the restrooms fell through the cracks. And that's inexcusable.

Lawyer's wrist slap: Former Greensburg lawyer James Gefsky, convicted of stealing more than $71,000 from a client, will avoid the prosecution's request for up to 14 months in jail because he's a “good guy.” So good, says Westmoreland County Judge Al Bell, that he sentenced Mr. Gefsky to three years' probation, with six months of house arrest. Gefsky reportedly repaid the sum, with interest, and apologized. But how does this wet-noodle sentence set the bar for lawyers?

Tapping a lucrative resource: With 37 Marcellus shale gas wells on its Beaver Run Reservoir property and drilling royalties expected to provide 10 percent of its revenues by year's end, the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County has hired an auditing firm to oversee this income. Yes, care and safety in drilling must be of paramount importance. And there's good reason to believe that will be the case as the authority's future depends on protected water sources.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.