TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Right to Know: A welcome rebuke

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Saturday, June 28, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

A commonsense Commonwealth Court ruling ensures that the state's Office of Open Records can do its job. But the fact that this case was brought at all indicates how far Pennsylvania still has to go to guarantee government transparency.

Activist Beverly Schenck, a former supervisor in Center, Butler County, filed an open records request seeking invoices for that township's solicitor. Center provided invoice copies — minus key figures. Ms. Schenck appealed to the Office of Open Records for a confidential hearing by a judge who would review the invoices and decide whether they should be made public.

The township refused to provide the invoices to the office, contending they were exempt from public release on grounds of attorney-client and attorney-work product privilege and the office didn't have authority to demand them. But a Commonwealth Court panel ruled that the Office of Open Records indeed has that authority under the Right to Know Law.

Ruling otherwise would have hamstrung the Office of Open Records, which has to be able to examine documents in question to decide such issues. Sadly, though, the township's stance shows that some government officials persist in absurdly believing that the public has no business knowing the public's business.

Only when that arrogant, government-knows-best mindset is replaced by one with proper regard for the public's right to know will Pennsylvania truly approach the level of government transparency its citizens and taxpayers deserve.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Medicare @ 50: Sick, getting sicker
  2. The Thursday wrap
  3. Regional growth
  4. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  5. The Fiat Chrysler mess: Government’s virus
  6. Mon-Yough Laurels & Lances
  7. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  8. At the VA: The waiting dead
  9. U.N. Watch: The ‘race’ is on
  10. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?