Saturday essay: Call of the garden
There were no first tomatoes by Independence Day this year. Heck, they weren't even close to being ripe. But they'll come soon enough.
Many of the 'maters — some in the greenhouse, most in the raised beds but a few more on the back deck — are larger than golf balls now. The warm nights have been kind to them; a first harvest is only a few weeks away.
Elsewhere in the garden, much of the real estate reserved for spring lettuce, now largely spent, has been repurposed. Alvaro melons, a first-time crop that began life in the greenhouse, have been transplanted into one bed; greenhouse leeks, late to be thinned, have been transitioned into another.
The first of the green beans, late, were picked this week. But the first hint of blight is cause for grave concern. The first cucumber will be harvested any day now. And a first harvest of peas, also late, is only days away (if, that is, the proprietor can resist standing in the garden and partaking in their raw sweetness). Lima beans, just flowering, will complement late summer dinners.
There will be a few more, but far smaller, cuttings of more heat-tolerant lettuces in the greenhouse for another week; planning for the fall lettuces has begun in earnest. Fall carrots were sown on Monday, the autumn bok choy has just sprouted and ... oh, excuse me ... the garden is calling.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Solyndra scandal: Government culpability
- Sunday pops
- Hogtying a terrorist: Heroes step up
- The Box
- Ford City facts: Blaming the messenger
- Saturday essay: Cusps of change
- Witnesses can help
- The markets: Easy money’s slap
- The Pa. pensions debate: Union hypocrisy
- President Carbon: Hypocrisy’s trip
- Elephants & the Pittsburgh Zoo: Who knows best?