| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The PUC, Lyft & Uber: The real 'threat'

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

The hole in the head of the Pennsylvania regulatory state is larger than we ever could have imagined. Witness its nonsensical ruling ordering two ride-sharing services to immediately shut down in Pittsburgh.

Lyft and Uber are innovative startups that use a smartphone application — and private drivers and vehicles — to exploit the manifest deficiencies of the local taxi monopoly. Because they accept “donations” instead of “charging fares,” Lyft and Uber thought they could bypass the state Public Utility Commission's monopoly-protecting ways.

That, of course, has the PUC's knickers in a knot. And in the Bureaucratic States of America, thumbing one's nose at regulators bent on restraining free trade is a capital offense. So, the PUC was forced to create, out of whole cloth, a public safety “threat.”

An undercover PUC gendarme has been targeting the ride-sharing services for months, issuing hefty fines. When Lyft and Uber continued operating, the PUC sought — and on Tuesday received from a pair of administrative law judges — a cease-and-desist order until the services obtain licenses, already applied for.

The judges ruled that Lyft and Uber pose an immediate threat to public safety, never mind that there's no evidence supporting that conclusion. Thus, the only “threat” here is to the state of overregulation and, of course, to regulators who, in their zealotry to “protect” the public (if not their power), only are disserving it.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Kittanning Laurels & Lances
  2. Saturday essay: Garden chances
  3. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  4. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  5. The Connellsville Redevelopment Authority: Facts & findings
  6. Jamestown revealed: History comes alive
  7. Regional growth
  8. The Box
  9. Dodd-Frank turns 5: What a mess
  10. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  11. Greensburg Tuesday takes