Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Shhhh! Secret!: The South Fayette School Board has rejected the Trib's Right to Know request for documents related to the cost of a proposed high school expansion. Never mind that it discussed the material in a public meeting, it claims it doesn't have to release the information to the media because it is “pre-decisional.” Previously, board President Leonard Fornella refused to release it, chiding the reporter seeking it as “a novice who won't understand it.” Public schools. Public money. Public information. What's South Fayette hiding behind its board president's arrogance?
Where does it end? Two developers seeking to build apartments and parking spaces on two SouthSide Works parcels say they need city tax incentives to make the project work. But critics remind that the complex, part of a tax-increment financing district, already has been publicly incentivized. As the Allegheny Institute's Eric Montarti notes, “The public has done its part.” Taxpayers should not be exploited as venture capitalists anymore.
A breather: The Pittsburgh Pirates are struggling at the All-Star break, just having finished a 2-4 road trip. The Bucs are in fourth place in the National League Central Division with their 49-46 record, 31⁄2 games behind Milwaukee. The Pirates return to action Friday against the Colorado Rockies. Pittsburgh is a talent-laden team and a return to the fundamentals could do it wonders.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Justice Department’s improper political agenda
- Digitized medical records: They’ve become an unsecured threat