Share This Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, July 17, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To the South Greensburg chain saw massacre. The borough's council walked into a buzz saw when it signed a contract to clear trees from a community park, much to the ire of residents. Council backed off after the state inquired about a requisite forestry plan for the project. Oops! There was none. This whole mess could have been avoided if residents were involved from the get-go — not after 70 trees were cut. Given the borough's abysmal due diligence, perhaps the council also reasoned that folks wouldn't notice all those felled trees.

Lance: To the Franklin Township Municipal Authority. For the past 30 to 35 years, it has allowed Manager Jim Brucker to take an authority vehicle on vacation — sometimes 500-plus miles away to North Carolina's Outer Banks. And that's raised the ire of a Murrysville councilman, who calls the practice “unacceptable.” But “outrageous” would be the better descriptive.

Laurel: To polishing Westmoreland County's “crown jewel.” With more than $753,000 in private donations, along with a state grant and county funding, Westmoreland officials are expanding facilities at Twin Lakes Park with an amphitheater and dek hockey rink. That's a good investment in an outstanding county resource.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.