Greensburg Tuesday takes
Tornado cleanup: Under a new state law, homeowners now have recourse to dispute unwarranted mechanics liens when a contractor fails to pay for building materials. State Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, introduced the legislation after 17 Westmoreland County homeowners, in the aftermath of a 2011 tornado, got slapped with liens because their roofing contractor didn't pay his building materials supplier. Now homeowners who pay their contractors in full won't get double dipped on materials, especially after coping with a devastating storm.
Checks & balances: The Rev. Emil Stephen Payer has been ordered to pay more than $98,000 in restitution for stealing from a South Huntingdon church. And exactly how much does the Greensburg Diocese realistically expect to collect from a 69-year-old priest who's on administrative leave? What's needed are better checks and balances at the parish council level to catch errant spending, by the pastor or anyone else, before it becomes a fiscal catastrophe.
A sinkhole widens: Jeannette's leaders got a snapshot of the city's fiscal health, and it isn't flattering. The latest financial report shows Jeannette finished last year with more than a $615,000 deficit and is on pace to end 2014 significantly in the red, says Mayor Richard Jacobelli. Councilman Bill Bedont, however, puts this year's shortfall at about $50,000. And the city's plan for resolving its deficit spending? It would be nice to see one.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.