ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, July 21, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Symptom of a disease: Officials are moving ahead with a reorganization of Westmoreland County's Common Pleas Court to allow for a drug court. Grants will be sought for its implementation. Sadly, a specific court for drug defendants is a response to the area's ongoing surge in cheap heroin, prescription painkiller abuse and rising overdose deaths. Read on.

Easy prescriptions: The apparent ease in obtaining prescription painkillers is evident in charges against three Mt. Pleasant Township residents and two others who allegedly obtained thousands of pills from area pharmacies in four counties over 10 months. One of the suspects worked at a medical center, where a prescription pad allegedly was used to write bogus prescriptions. How many? For its own use the group fraudulently obtained more than 4,000 Oxycodone pills, authorities said. It's no wonder Westmoreland County is battling a prescription drug problem.

Planning? What planning?: Only 32 of 65 Westmoreland County municipalities have submitted data for a hazard mitigation plan, which details how these locales would be affected by disasters, such as flooding or blizzards. Doing so qualifies them for federal funding if the president declares a state of emergency, a county official says. Surely the requisite information is at local leaders' fingertips from their own disaster plans — which presumably are regularly updated, right?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.