The Thursday wrap
Detroit, the great American bankrupt city, has suspended for 15 days water shutoffs for thousands of customers who haven't paid their bills. Some groups are complaining that free water is nothing less than a human right and have gone to court. But as Detroit News columnist Nolan Finley pointed out, while “barely 50 percent of Detroiters pay their water bill ... up to two-thirds of city residents pay to keep their cable or satellite television service current. And 72 percent do the same to maintain their cellphones.” Sounds as if the water scofflaws have their priorities out of whack, doesn't it? ... Samantha Power, President Obama's confidante and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, last week produced a photo of a hotel that had collapsed in the West African nation of Benin, supposedly because of the ravages of global warming. But as CNSNews reported, the photo that she posted on her Twitter account actually was of a hotel that collapsed a dozen years ago, a collapse blamed on the illegal mining of coastal sand. Sigh. What's a climate-clucker to do? ... Speaking of climate change, Australia has repealed its carbon tax as an unworkable economy clobberer. The tax imposed additional average cost of $515 for each consumer. Australia instead will explore moving to a voluntary incentive program to entice industries to use cleaner energy sources. The development creates a conundrum for the Group of 20, whose next meeting just happens to be in Brisbane in November. Perhaps climate-clucking nations will boycott the meeting, not travel to Brisbane and reduce their own substantial carbon footprint?
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.