Blaming Israel: A new low
The blame-Israel anti-Semitism of the duplicitously named United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) and the intellectually and morally bankrupt Western academics of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement remains as predictable — and as vile — as ever.
The U.K.'s Express newspaper reports that during an “emergency” HRC session in Geneva — convened at the behest of Palestinians and Egyptians and boycotted by Israel — Navi Pillay, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, warned that the Jewish state's self-defensive incursion into Hamas-controlled Gaza will be investigated for war crimes. That's brazen hypocrisy from a panel that includes notorious human-rights violators China, Cuba, Russia and Saudi Arabia — and blames Israel at every turn.
BDS criticism of Israel's Gaza operations is just as far off the mark in demanding “a proportionality in asymmetrical warfare that only means one thing: that not enough Jews are being killed,” Phyllis Chesler writes for Breitbart. She notes that blame-Israel BDS voices “only howl in rage when Jews kill Muslim terrorists in self-defense and in defense of Israeli civilians,” ignoring Muslims killing Muslims and Christians — and Hamas' use of Gaza's civilians, schools, hospitals and homes to shield its terrorists and weapons.
Anti-Semitic Hamas and its enablers are to blame for Gaza's plight — not Israel, which is defending its very existence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.