Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
What a waste: State and Washington County officials used a federal grant to surveil then seize more than 800 marijuana plants last week. Even the Civil Air Patrol and a National Guard helicopter were used. What a horrible waste of public resources.
Check that list: Highmark Inc. might want to check its insurance rolls more carefully. If it does, it likely will find it's still sending mailings and making robocalls to former customers. How many? Who knows? And why? But you can bet that it's an unnecessary expense that only keeps the cost of health insurance artificially high.
How ironic: Allegheny County Council, concerned about possible email snooping by the executive branch, met several times in bogus executive sessions to secretly discuss what to do. And the council's solicitor even took the Trib to court to block access to records related to the snooping debate. What is this, Mad magazine's “Spy vs. Spy”?
A fitting host: Pittsburgh will host the National League of Cities' Congress of Cities and Exposition in November 2016. Leaders from around the country will discuss every idea imaginable for the betterment of cities. It's an apropos event for Pittsburgh as it celebrates its 200th birthday and as it continues its transformation to keep step with — and in some cases, keep a step ahead of — the times.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.