The New York Times reports that the Europeans have paid al-Qaida and its direct affiliates at least $125 million in ransom money since 2008 to secure the return of those kidnapped. It's how the terrorist groups underwrite their terror campaigns these days and only emboldens more kidnapping. Whatever happened to refusing to negotiate with terrorists? It's a bitter pill for those taken hostage but it's the only way to stop these thugs. ... The Export-Import Bank, the darling of the corporate wealthfare crowd, uses a wholly bogus method to calculate how many domestic jobs are directly related to the bank's loan largess, reports The Washington Examiner's Timothy P. Carney. Yet politicians — and chamber of commerce types — routinely use such numbers to shill for the bank's reauthorization. As Mr. Carney reminds, “The biggest reason to doubt Ex-Im's jobs number is that government subsidies generally don't create jobs or profits — they move money around the economy.” As we've repeatedly editorialized, it's past time for the Export-Import Bank to go away. ... The Department of Homeland Security dispatched “six vehicles full of DHS agents ... to seize a Land Rover” suspected of violating EPA emissions regulations from a Statesville, N.C., couple, Infowars.com reports. What, no machine guns?
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.