ShareThis Page

Connellsville bright spots, but more work needed

| Friday, Aug. 1, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

There seems to be some life returning to the City of Connellsville.

Michael Edwards, executive director of the Connellsville Redevelopment Authority, recently touted all the good things happening in our town. Among them: Several new businesses have opened or are planning to open on the city's West Side, and plans for the new hotel also are moving along.

There are good things happening on the East Side as well. Crowds are coming downtown on the weekends for the city's farmers markets and the popular Lions Square weekly concert series. The new railroad display and canteen also are receiving good reviews as is the Friends of the Carnegie Free Library's Cafe Carnegie.

And we know there are other good things happening — all because the residents of Connellsville care.

Now, we'd like to see city council get on the same page.

Our new council has many obstacles facing it. And some are well known. Let's face it: Our town could use a face-lift in many areas.

But council seems to be at a standstill. An ordinance that would deal with some issues involving blighted properties has been bounced around for several months. It's been introduced, discussed, changes suggested, changes made and tabled.

We understand that council has concerns. But at some point a decision has to be made.

There are other issues demanding our council's attention. Let's at least move ahead on one issue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.