TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The House lawsuit: Necessary & proper

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, July 31, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

Democrats have turned up the reverb on their talking points echo machine now that the GOP-led U.S. House has voted to file a lawsuit against President Obama for exceeding his constitutional authority.

The White House taunted Republicans, promising more “executive action,” not bothering to mention that the lawsuit will target Mr. Obama's extra-constitutional suspension of key ObamaCare provisions. Before the vote, Obama, attempting to deflect attention away from his lawlessness, implored Republicans to “stop just hatin' all the time.”

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., ever the astute fundraiser, called the lawsuit a precursor to the impeachment that it isn't. But then she unintentionally spoke a questioning truth: “Why would you sue somebody unless you want to prove something?”

Indeed. As former Justice Department official David Rivkin and Florida International University constitutional scholar Elizabeth Price Foley wrote in The Wall Street Journal, “The lawsuit is necessary to protect the Constitution's separation of powers, a core means of protecting individual liberty. Without a judicial check on unbounded executive power to suspend the law, this president and all who follow him will have a powerful new weapon to destroy political accountability and democracy itself.”

Here's to the courts restoring both.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Myopic automakers should embrace today’s high-tech gearheads, not attempt to stifle their innovations
  2. The Box
  3. Sunday pops
  4. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  5. U.N. Watch: End this ‘relief’
  6. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  7. Obama’s problem: He denies reality
  8. The gathering storm: An IRS defeat
  9. Auberle continues to heal
  10. Not even a ‘trickle’ of sound economics
  11. Don’t weaken Marine standards for women