The Thursday wrap
The Guardian newspaper in England reports that some of the world's top public relations firms no longer will work with “climate change deniers.” Proving yet again that the first casualty of public relations is the truth. ... Speaking of PR, the FBI is looking to hire a company to grade the news coverage it receives as either “positive,” “negative” or “neutral,” The Washington Times reports. It's a fairly standard practice among private companies looking to burnish their image and avoid negative publicity. So, based on the findings, will the FBI cater to “friendly” reporters and ignore the questioning ones? ... President Obama was against the Export-Import Bank before he was for it. Six years ago, Sen. Barack Obama called it what we've repeatedly called it — “little more than a fund for corporate welfare,” reminds The Washington Free Beacon. But Friday last, the president chided Republicans not wanting to renew its charter. Why Mr. Obama flip-flopped is the question he doesn't appear willing to answer. ... Secretary of State John Kerry says farmers are suffering from “unpredictable rainfall patterns” caused by climate change. Excuse us, Mr. Secretary, but that's been a part of farming since the first farmer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- A hunting question: A Pennsylvania proposal to limit the game that mentored youth hunters can take appears to be a solution in search of a problem
- The Thursday wrap
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers