Arrogant federal overreach dips to a new low with rules that threaten a time-honored tradition — school bake sales that provide sweet treats for students and ease taxpayer burdens by helping to pay for sports, cheerleading, band and other activities.
Effective this month and applying this fall at schools participating in federal meals programs, the new rules stem from the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act touted by self-appointed first lunch lady Michelle Obama and her anti-childhood-obesity “Let's Move!” campaign. The Wall Street Journal says the rules ban daytime sales of items that don't meet federal nutrition standards, such as typical bake sale items. States have some say in how many “infrequent” exceptions are allowed — and the feds have fines for violations.
To date, 32 states allow no exceptions, according to the School Nutrition Association. And even when a bake sale is allowed, some schools prohibit homemade items, limiting offerings to processed items bearing precise nutritional information.
Such micromanagement of community life is in keeping with the “government knows best” agenda behind federal diktats on toilets' water consumption and what light bulbs can and can't be sold. Hopefully, bake sales are where Americans will draw a line — by telling government “hands off!” when it comes to cookies and cupcakes that both sweeten and enrich the educational experience.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.N. Watch: Another jaded ‘inquiry’
- The revolving door: Washington’s ‘gift’
- The Thursday wrap
- Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- The Kathleen Kane chronicles: New and serious questions are being raised about the Pa. attorney general
- Sunday pops
- Picking winners & losers: Stop the idiocy