Another Corbett administration scandal? 'Delete' & 'cleanse' at the Education Department
The scent of scandal is enveloping the administration of Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett just as the gubernatorial race heads into its fall furlong. And it has nobody to blame but itself.
First, there are the meetings with political operatives in the governor's office. While the administration insists there's nothing inappropriate about a practice that's clearly inappropriate, campaign spokesman Mike Barley went a stupid step too far when he insisted no state tax money was involved. Who pays for that office again?
Now comes word from Acting state Education Secretary Carolyn Dumaresq that there's been a daily “delete and cleanse” email operation going on. That's not merely inappropriate, it's probably illegal.
Worse, the revelation comes in the midst of criticism that former Secretary Ron Tomalis, retained at the same salary as an adviser to Mr. Corbett on higher education, is nothing more than a ghost employee. State records suggest quite limited email activity for Mr. Tomalis over the last year. Whether such correspondence was that limited or was cleansed remains the question. But neither explanation is very flattering.
This has become the summer of discontent for Camp Corbett. And given the seriousness of these latest revelations, it's difficult to see how a fall of failure doesn't follow.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Arneson firing: Legally dubious
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- The Box
- A hunting question: A Pennsylvania proposal to limit the game that mentored youth hunters can take appears to be a solution in search of a problem
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk