Greensburg Tuesday takes
Paying up: Increases in the collection of restitution payments to Westmoreland County crime victims (up 37 percent in 2013) reflect an ongoing trend since Clerk of Courts Bryan Kline took office in 2009. Defendants who miss their payments are summoned to a hearing. That's as it should be. Court-ordered fines and restitution become meaningless if they go uncollected. It's good to see that the buck does indeed stop at Mr. Kline's office.
No news is good news: Three years of water testing at the Beaver Run Reservoir, which serves more than half of the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County's 120,000 customers, has turned up no adverse effects linked to nearby Marcellus shale gas wells. Testing is scheduled for a fourth year in the area, where 37 wells have been drilled. All this is encouraging. With gas wells near a vital water supply, there is no substitute for consistent vigilance.
Power to the people: The good news is that the company planning a $500 million gas-fired power plant in South Huntingdon already has negotiated the obstacles that typically hamstring similar projects, according to a regional transmission organization. But the plant developer, Tenaska Inc., is delaying the start of construction until next year as it looks for long-term electricity contracts. With six Pennsylvania coal-fired plants expected to go offline by 2019, this power plant project has taken on added significance.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.