Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Drawing power: A surge in use of North Park has occurred as private-sector contractors in recent years have added amenities to Allegheny County's largest park. The OTB Bicycle Cafe at the Boathouse, the Go Ape zipline course and rentals of canoes, kayaks and rowboats on the park's lake have proven so popular that county officials have had to expand parking capacity. That's good reason to repeat what we've said previously: Let's have more such ventures that enhance public assets without adding to taxpayers' burden.
Start of something big: Infrastructure work will follow this month's clearing of a former steel mill from the 178-acre former LTV Steel Co. site in Hazelwood. Downtown-based Regional Industrial Development Corp. and four foundations, partnering as Almono, envision more than $1 billion in residential, office and industrial development there over two decades, with two-thirds of new tax revenue the project generates paying off bonds in an $80 million tax-increment-financing plan. Close, sustained scrutiny must ensure that unlike too many TIFs, this one, the city's largest ever, doesn't make unwilling venture capitalists of taxpayers.
PNC Park prescription: Now hosting the Detroit Tigers after losing a home series to the San Diego Padres for the 14th consecutive time, the Pirates are free of that seeming jinx but still hurting from injuries. Chants of “Get well soon!” for Neil Walker and Andrew McCutchen can alternate with “Let's go Bucs!”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.