The Thursday wrap
Inquiring minds want to know if Pittsburgh's iconic H.J. Heinz Co. could be the next corporation to flee the United States for a foreign country to cut its tax bite. After all, the same billionaire, Warren Buffett, who teamed up with 3G Capital of Brazil to help send Burger King packing to Canada in a tax-inversion merger deal with Tim Hortons helped 3G acquire Heinz last year. All together now — “An-tih-sih-pay-yay-shun.” ... Mr. Buffett, by the way, had been what The Wall Street Journal referred to as President Obama's “business front man” for years. And the president has labeled tax inversions as nothing less than unpatriotic. Will the president of the United States soon be calling out the Oracle of Omaha for being “un-American”? We simply can't wait for the NSA to release a transcript of the bugged telephone conversation, can you? ... The New York Times reports that the president will bypass Congress and “forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations” to cut their carbon emissions. They're calling it a “politically binding” deal to “name and shame” violators instead of a “treaty,” the latter of which would stand no chance to be approved by the U.S. Senate. As the Obama administration's philosophy long has been, if you can't get what you want, perpetrate a stunt. Perhaps the president next will take to the bully pulpit in a smokestack costume.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.