Share This Page

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Aug. 28, 2014, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To the schedulers. A robust North Shore can be a wonderful thing. But schedulers should have known better than to have the Pitt Panthers open their season at noon on Saturday at Heinz Field, then have the Pittsburgh Pirates play at 4:05 p.m. at PNC Park. Couple that with the annual rib festival and it's a recipe for a disastrous traffic and parking situation that's not simply an inconvenience but a public safety threat. The schedulers can and must do better.

Laurel: To the Allegheny County Airport Authority. It has reversed course, at least temporarily, on a policy that would have booted longtime Salvation Army kettle worker Marilyn Darnley, 72, out of Pittsburgh International Airport. It was part of a shortsighted blanket policy that barred solicitation at the facility. A public outcry forced the reconsideration, one that we hope will preserve a most worthy effort.

A challenge: To Pittsburgh's foundations. A coalition of foundations opposed to a private developer buying the insolvent August Wilson Center for black culture and adding a hotel says there's no middle ground in the debate. “(W)e can't in any way that is consistent with our values see us devoting philanthropic dollars to support what is ultimately a hotel deal,” says Heinz Endowments President Grant Oliphant. Then we challenge the coalition to put its money where its values are, satisfying the center's outstanding debts and outbidding the developer for control.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.