Greensburg Laurels & Lances
On the “Watch List”: The Westmoreland County Courthouse computer mess. A county controller's audit found that data and court records could have been lost during the installation of a new $47,000 computer system last year in the Register of Wills office. Register of Wills Michael Ginsburg blamed any lingering problems on the county's computer information systems department. Dave Ridilla of the latter denied his office dropped the ball. Finger-pointing aside, we trust someone stepped up to ensure that this new, expensive system does what it's supposed to do.
Laurel: To A.J. Meyers and Sons. The Derry Township school bus depot for the Greater Latrobe School District had buses up and running on Monday despite vandalism to 20 vehicle ignitions and the theft of 9,000 gallons of diesel fuel last weekend. That's more than $27,000 in fuel. Here's hoping this back to school escapade will land the culprits in jail.
Laurel: To upholding freedom of religion: The Diocese of Greensburg joins the Pittsburgh and Erie dioceses in winning injunctions against contraception mandates under the Affordable Care Act. As drafted, ObamaCare would “cause (plaintiffs) to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs; or their ... disregard of (it) will cause them to potentially incur large monetary fines and/or other penalties,” wrote U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab. Simply put, ObamaCare is constitutionally defective.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.