ShareThis Page

The medical device tax: An abject failure

| Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

ObamaCare's 2.3-percent tax on gross U.S. sales of medical devices is an abject failure that Congress must repeal.

Writing for , health-care expert and Pacific Research Institute head Sally Pipes says the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration reported in August “that just about everything that could go wrong with the medical device tax has.”

Yielding just three-quarters of the $1.2 billion that the Internal Revenue Service projected it would between April and September 2013, its problems include:

• IRS inability to tell which companies owe the tax, reporting errors that have firms paying millions of dollars too much or too little and IRS errors costing more than 200 companies $700,000-plus in unwarranted penalties

• The tax's cost forcing cuts in capital investments and research and development spending, plus higher medical-device prices that depress sales

• And, per an industry survey, 33,000 fewer jobs in the tax's first year as not-yet-profitable startups struggle to pay it.

Unintended or not, these consequences were not unforeseen. Ms. Pipes notes 34 Democrats were among 79 senators voting for a March 2013 nonbinding repeal resolution, with the House “similarly on record” and “enough support to override a presidential veto” likely.

In other words, there's every reason to repeal this tax.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.