ShareThis Page

The right to work: W.Va.'s next up

| Sunday, Dec. 13, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

It appears increasingly likely that West Virginia could become the nation's 26th right-to-work state. And that will send a clarion message to Big Labor that the days of forced union dues are coming to an end.

While union sentiment runs deep in The Mountain State, 80 percent of union members believe paying union dues should be the workers' choice, according to polling information cited by Heritage Foundation researcher James Sherk. Among West Virginia voters, right to work is supported by almost 3-to-1, he says.

So it's likely that West Virginia's Legislature will advance right-to-work legislation when it reconvenes in January. And that has more than a few labor bosses, state and national, on edge and already pumping out the union propaganda.

But exactly how freedom to choose whether to pay union dues will be costlier β€” or deadlier β€” for West Virginians is anyone's guess. Voters in other right-to-work states, including Indiana and Michigan, continue to support freedom over unions' fear mongering.

β€œIt's not surprising that union bosses are using inaccurate scare tactics to protect their fat-cat salaries,” said Jason Huffman, West Virginia director of Americans for Prosperity.

Here's hoping West Virginia's leaders will put fairness ahead of empty union rhetoric. And what's good for West Virginia would be great for Pennsylvania.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.