Liberal faculty wrapping college students in bubble wrap
A new UCLA study shows the ratio of liberal college professors to conservatives has become increasingly tilted. “Progressives” now outnumber conservatives by 5-to-1.
And some observers believe that ratio is considerably greater, perhaps even 9-to-1, depending on how “conservatism” is defined.
According to the University of California at Los Angeles' Higher Education Research Institute, 60 percent of professors identified themselves as “liberal” in 2014 compared with 42 percent in 1990. Conversely, the number of conservative professors dropped by nearly 6 percent.
And the effect on campus culture? Given liberals' penchant for control, the free-speech movement of the '60s has been supplanted by campus “safe zones” and crackdowns on any speech deemed “hateful.”
“It's been frustrating” watching the trend in speech suppression, says Greg Lukianoff, author of “Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate.”
Penn State associate professor Matthew Woessner questions the effect of this trend on the national political discourse. Today, the average political scientist is a “mainstream” liberal, says Professor Carson Holloway of the University of Nebraska Omaha.
But even more disturbing, the overly protective bubble wrap in which liberal academia binds students is poor preparation for the real world's harsh realities.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.