Share This Page

Road crew 'abducts' motorists in tunnels

| Saturday, Dec. 14, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Held hostage by PennDOT?

Sounds preposterous. The state Transportation Department deals in road construction, not sudden abduction.

But what happened to more than 20 motorists on Thursday usually occurs only to tourists who make the ill-advised decision to venture off Mexico's main highways. Their journeys were abruptly interrupted not by banditos, but by PennDOT workers who greatly overstepped the authority they didn't possess to begin with.

The drivers were traveling through the Fort Pitt Tunnels when their vehicles were commandeered by a PennDOT truck and herded into a maintenance area immediately outside the tunnel. They were told they were forbidden to leave.

“We were all just taken aback by what was going on,” Carissa Mendez, 26, of Aliquippa told WPXI-TV. “There was no law enforcement there, and we were all held in this area. We were blocked in on each side by PennDOT trucks.”

The PennDOT workers accused their prisoners of running a light at the tunnel entrance that had turned red to halt traffic and enable them to remove ice accumulations inside the tunnels.

That the motorists insisted the light had switched from red to green did not appease their captors. The motorists were told they were being detained until the state police arrived to issue them citations.

The hostages spent about an hour in captivity, even though PennDOT has no authority to confine anyone, regardless of their alleged disregard of the motor vehicle code. That power rests with the police, not some guys in trucks knocking down icicles with shovels.

PennDOT spokesman Steve Cowan acknowledged that fact on Friday, saying the employees' actions “went against our policy. We are not to detain any motorists.”

Cowan said PennDOT is continuing to investigate what caused the traffic signal at the tunnel entrance to apparently malfunction.

“Whether it was a system failure or a human error, we're not certain at this point, But we want to get to the bottom of this,” he said.

Cowan wouldn't reveal whether the workers had been disciplined, saying he can't discuss a personnel matter.

“But we are discussing this matter internally, and we take it very seriously,” he said. “We made a mistake we shouldn't have made, and we apologize for any inconvenience we caused.”

The apology probably is a good idea. Under section 2903 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, the second-degree misdemeanor of false imprisonment occurs when someone knowingly restrains another person unlawfully so as to interfere substantially with their liberty.

I'm no legal expert. But if someone forced me off the road and unlawfully held me against my will for an hour, I'd certainly consider my liberty to be compromised. I'd believe myself to be falsely imprisoned.

Perhaps those ridiculously overzealous workers shouldn't just be fearing punishment by PennDOT. Perhaps they should be fearing arrest.

Wouldn't that be ironic? They'd be taken into custody for taking people into custody.

Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or eheyl@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.