Dirty truth behind restaurant grading system in Allegheny County
What's the rush? Who cares if a restaurant's flatware consistently contains crusty remnants when emerging from the dishwasher?
In its fourth year, the Allegheny County Health Department's prolonged attempt to devise a new grading system for restaurant sanitation and cleanliness has entered an exciting stage.
It just won't be useful to people wondering if the lights in their favorite eatery are low for romantic effect, or to make less noticeable the critters scurrying across the floor.
The health department on Wednesday announced it's ready to immediately test the proposed system's latest incarnation, just not right away. That'll happen beginning in July at every restaurant in the county, save for most of them.
Will the grades of the restaurants inspected during the test phase be released? Board of Health members answered that question by essentially saying, “Are you daft, man? We could never do that. This is but a pilot program!”
If the pilot program proves successful, if county council signs off on it, if the health department doesn't chuck the entire system and go back to square one, then the program will finally move into post-pilot mode. Perhaps.
Once that occurs (which given the tortuous history of this endeavor isn't guaranteed, but is a possible near-certainty), restaurants will be graded according to the new standards. If an eatery is found to be operating under conditions that would make most diners recoil in horror, the public will be notified.
Just not right away. You can't be too hasty in matters involving food safety and sanitation.
In the new grading system, points will be deducted for what the health department labels “non-critical violations” but what most people would consider “critical enough that I'm sure never eating at that place again.” Two unappetizing examples: Live roaches (potential five-point deduction) and dead rodents (potential three-point deduction).
If enough points are deducted to drop the letter grade from an A to a B, restaurants will have the opportunity to correct the violations and be re-inspected before the grade is publicly posted.
But second inspections are absolutely, positively final. There are no exceptions to that rule — unless the untidy restaurant owner wants to pay $150 for a third inspection. That one is absolutely, positively final under the strictest of regulations that can only be altered arbitrarily if a health department that can't seem to make up its mind on such matters chooses to do so.
Given the tortoise-paced progress the health department has made on this initiative since undertaking it in 2010, don't be surprised if the transition from pilot program to formal policy goes beyond the predicted start date in September.
That's OK, because the grading system is overly complicated and tilts unfairly in the direction of restaurateurs. Second and third chances when roaches are running rampant? After four years, this is the best the health department could do?
For restaurant patrons, that's some unappetizing food for thought.
Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fleury’s career-best 6th shutout lifts Penguins over Avalanche in overtime
- Rossi: Brawl for ADs between Pitt and WVU
- Clairton students reference positive ‘Frozen’-themed lessons
- Steelers must be creative in providing snaps for linebackers
- Analysis: Misunderstood Chryst served Pitt well
- Elizabeth Forward marks 35th year of senior holiday breakfast
- McKeesport Area fourth-grader thrilled with gift from White Oak Lions Club
- Time is of essence for Pitt in finding football coach, athletic director
- Veteran tight end Miller’s blocking skill crucial to success to Steelers running game
- Pitt offensive coordinator Rudolph still focused on Panthers
- Samples show Plumcreek gas leaks aren’t methane