Romoff worth every cent to UPMC
He's far too modest to complain.
But it's easy to argue that UPMC CEO Jeffrey Romoff is due a substantial raise. He made a paltry $6.6 million in 2012, according to tax returns the health system released on Friday for the 2012-13 fiscal year.
Based on where he's taken UPMC since then, an annual salary of less than $10 million for Romoff seems borderline criminal. Or at least it would be, if state lawmakers would only enact an Equitable Compensation for Supreme Rulers of Monolithic Medical Conglomerates Act.
To say that Romoff earned every penny in 2012 is an understatement. UPMC made $348 million from operations on total revenue of $9.6 billion in 2012. Its net income was $221 million.
But there's more to a nonprofit than its profits. Since 2012, Romoff has presided over a brand-conscious outfit that consistently comes up with innovative ways to positively keep itself in the public eye.
I'm not just referring to the near-daily headlines UPMC draws from its expensive war on multiple fronts against Highmark, the state's largest insurer and owner of the rival Allegheny Health Network. A battle that ultimately could cost thousands of people access to UPMC physicians and facilities.
I'm referring to the following:
• In a court filing related to the city of Pittsburgh's challenge of its tax-exempt status, UPMC incredibly claimed that it has no employees. That news came as a surprise to the 60,000 people who draw a paycheck from the corporation. Amazingly, most of these non-employees continue to show up at UPMC facilities daily and perform tasks that most people would accurately describe as work.
• UPMC is a defendant in a lawsuit filed on behalf of nearly 27,000 people the health system contends don't work for it.
Curiously, these folks had a myriad of sensitive personnel data in UPMC computers that was accessed by hackers in a Target-worthy security breach. UPMC initially said only about 20 of its non-workers were affected; it since has acknowledged that nearly 800 were the victims of tax fraud.
• In March, Downtown motorists were surprised to find streets near UPMC's Grant Street headquarters blocked during rush hour by hundreds of people that UPMC continues to assert don't work for it.
The protest over wages UPMC pays, which attracted activists from other states, occurred over two days and ended only after Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto met with Romoff to discuss the non-workers' concerns.
The perpetually bashful Romoff didn't address the demonstrators, preferring to let Friday's tax filings do the talking for him. Here's what they said: In 2012, UPMC paid 30 people more than $1 million, up from 21 in 2011. That's not exactly a miserly amount to pay people not to work for you.
Romoff seldom gets the credit he deserves. He's always been reticent to toot his own horn, and there's a price to pay for that.
But even without another raise, Romoff certainly can afford it.
Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Roundup: Wealth gap largest on record, Pew study shows; McDonald’s in Japan limits orders of fries; more
- Starkey: Pederson had to go at Pitt
- Pederson’s 2nd tenure as the athletic director at Pitt comes to abrupt end
- Chryst returns home, named football coach at Wisconsin
- Philly DA says no affidavits claimed by AG Kane in bribery case existed
- Steelers, young and old, thirst for opportunity to reach the postseason
- QB Smith is chief concern for Steelers’ defense
- Demolition project at Oliver’s Pourhouse in Greensburg moves forward
- Home of LeNature’s exec up for sale
- Penguins continue to thrive, despite spate of ailments
- Rice Energy spin-off priced below expected range