ShareThis Page

'Lesser-known' from Ross ready to shake things up in New Hampshire

| Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
Matt Drozd of Ross was a two-term Allegheny County Council member.

Talk about a propulsive political storyline.

The Iowa caucuses were intriguing but provided no definitive answer to the question destined to make Tuesday's New Hampshire primary riveting, even to the presidential campaign's most casual observers.

Do Ted Cruz, Donald Trump and Marco Rubio stand a chance against Matt Drozd?

The Republican front-runners didn't have to worry about the former Allegheny County councilman in the Hawkeye State. You can bet their bleary-eyed campaign strategists have been spending late nights devising ways to attempt to neutralize him.

Drozd brings to the race the locomotive-force momentum that comes with paying $1,000 to call oneself a presidential candidate, even if only momentarily. That's the amount 58 White House aspirants each spent to get their names on the crowded New Hampshire ballot.

The majority of them are referred to by locals as “lesser-knowns.” Most of them have as much chance of winning the primary as (Spoiler Alert!) Cinderella's pumpkin had of remaining a stagecoach after midnight.

Drozd, 71, of Ross realizes the glass Florsheims in which he'll traipse around New Hampshire this weekend could have a limited lifespan.

“I know I'm going to get blown away,” he said cheerfully when asked to predict where he'll finish. “But I still think I'm more qualified than most of the candidates to be president.”

Drozd hopes his platform of a stricter immigration policy, overhauling Obamacare and focusing the nation's counterterrorism efforts on biological threats will resonate with voters. The odds are against it.

Lesser-knowns traditionally get vote percentages so small they can't be seen, even with the world's most powerful microscope — a state-of-the-art Hitachi with a resolution of 43 picometers, which is less than half the radius of most atoms. Drozd at least appears to be poised to finish ahead of other lesser-knowns, given his resources in:

• Money: “I've spent about $400 so far,” he said. If the ballot fee is included, that impressive total jumps to a staggering $1,400.

• Advertising: “I have about 2,400 pamphlets I plan on distributing,” he said.

• Ground support: “A friend of mine is going up to New Hampshire with me,” he said. “We're going to hit the Starbucks and Paneras and get the message out to people.”

Drozd likely instills more fear in the front-runners than lesser-knowns such as Walter Iwachiw, a New York City registered nurse; Chomi Prag, a Wisconsin attorney and author of the courtroom thriller “Cult of Mirrors”; and Kevin Huey, a Denver real estate agent who has proposed combating oil spills with an invention he dubs “The Sucking Bubble.”

Having purchased their political vanity plates, those candidates probably will drop out after Tuesday. But in a move that should greatly concern Cruz, Trump and Rubio, Western Pennsylvania's lesser-known revealed his campaign's ambitious post-New Hampshire plan.

Said Drozd: “I might leave my website up for a while.”

Eric Heyl is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7857 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.