ShareThis Page

A day without U.S. tech workers?

| Sunday, March 12, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Last month, there was a national “Day Without a Latino.” Last week, the demonstration du jour shutting down schools and shops was “A Day Without a Woman.” Here's my question for all the virtue-signaling protesters who pay lip service to better jobs and wages: Where's your awareness-raising event for untold thousands of high-skilled Americans victimized by H-1B visa havoc? Thanks to cheap, labor-hungry big businesses and money-grubbing politicians in both parties, every day has become a “Day Without American Tech Workers.”

Our own best and brightest are vanishing in plain sight. It has been going on for decades — and it's all legal. Several court challenges to corporate abuse of the program have failed.

The same workplace nightmare that befell American tech employees at Disney, New York Life, Southern California Edison and countless other U.S. companies struck the taxpayer-subsidized University of California, San Francisco, smack dab in the middle of the West Coast's liberal paradise. Forty-nine information technology workers at the UC system's health care and research nerve center officially got the boot.

Like thousands before them, UCSF's loyal employees were coerced to dig their own graves: no severance packages unless and until they trained their inexperienced, cheap foreign replacements from India-based HCL Technologies Ltd. by Feb. 28. Raymond Dy, a UCSF systems administrator, called that “a big slap in the face” and said it was “insulting.”

It's also a privacy and security threat. Kurt Ho, 57, a systems administrator and lifelong Democrat who voted for Donald Trump, recounted “very young” H-1B foreign workers who had trouble comprehending basic instructions on how to operate “mission critical systems.” Ho voiced concern about giving away the keys to Americans' health data to unsupervised foreign visa holders and their counterparts overseas.

And that precious, left-wing San Francisco value of “diversity” got thrown out the window at UCSF, thanks to the H-1B visa replacement racket. Diversity doesn't mean jack if a bleeding-heart-liberal, Trump-bashing university can avoid paying high-skilled American workers' pensions and benefits.

Audrey Hatten-Milholin, 53, a 17-year UCSF senior systems architect, and many of her female colleagues lost their jobs despite “excellent performance reviews” as part of the school system's shortsighted attempt to “cut costs.” She recounted walking into an office suite to train the HCL foreigners to absorb her knowledge and eliminate her job, “and it seemed like everyone at their desk had a young male Indian worker there. I didn't see any women.”

President Trump vowed to stop the sabotage of American tech workers and has already put a halt to “fast-tracking” of what an Indian commerce official once dubbed “the outsourcing visa.” But the high-dollar H-1B lobbies here and abroad aren't going down without a fight.

If only Bay Area liberals and Beltway Democrats weren't so acutely addled by Trump Derangement Syndrome, they might actually do something to help the American women and workers they pretend to champion — instead of enabling their sellout.

Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.