ShareThis Page

The case for tax reform

| Monday, March 20, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

The Great Recession may have officially ended in 2009, but there's no denying the recovery continues to be slow and anemic: The overall economy grew at a paltry 1.9 percent in the final quarter of last year.

The economic situation over the last eight years has been especially hard on minorities, the shrinking middle class and business development around the nation and here in Pennsylvania.

In remarks in late 2015 to the African American Chamber of Commerce of Western Pennsylvania, Gov. Tom Wolf described the challenges facing the state. He noted, “Our economy doesn't work if some people feel the deck is stacked against them. Our free market economy runs on fairness. ... A tilted playing field dampens competition … . It also makes an economy less dynamic and less productive. ... Our economy cannot operate on all cylinders if all the cylinders are not allowed to operate.”

Indeed, Pennsylvania continues to struggle as evidenced by a 2015 growth rate below the national average — 1.7 percent compared to 2.4 percent.

The focus by President Donald Trump and Congress on job creation, boosting economic growth and regulatory reform, provides a unique opportunity to make Pennsylvania's economy healthier. The National Black Chamber of Commerce supports the U.S. House tax-reform blueprint — A Better Way — which will make the tax code simpler and fairer, lowering tax rates for individuals, small businesses and corporations, encouraging new business formation, and ending tax discrimination against domestic manufacturers and other businesses.

Small business is the driver of job creation, accounting for about 65 percent of new jobs. Here in Pennsylvania, small businesses employed 2.4 million people in 2013. But for its economy to “fire on all cylinders,” the nation's corporate tax rate must be lowered from the highest in the developed world — currently 35 percent versus a developed-world average of 22.5 percent.

Equally critical, the tax treatment for imports and exports has to be put on a level playing field. Many of our global competitors exempt their exports from their value added tax. There is no similar provision in the U.S. tax code. This means our global trading partners have an unfair tax advantage over American-made goods; our exports consequently carry a higher cost in the global marketplace.

The nonpartisan Tax Foundation's economic analyses of the House's proposed blueprint have concluded that leveling the playing field will increase domestic investment and job creation, hence strengthening our economy. The analyses also have concluded that border adjustment — which eliminates the double-taxation of goods being sold outside the U.S. — would strengthen the dollar, having the effect of lowering the cost of imports. This outcome is important because it means that the cost to consumers would not increase.

Pennsylvania's elected leaders in Congress should prioritize the interests of the state's consumers, who desire low prices on products, and the state's workers and the businesses that employ us.

The citizens of Pennsylvania can look forward to a brighter tomorrow from a stronger economy if Congress and the Trump administration move quickly on tax reform.

Harry Alford is president and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.