ShareThis Page

Teach students financial literacy

| Monday, June 19, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

As Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos sets out to reform America's underperforming public schools, let's hope she puts their appalling lack of personal finance instruction near the top of her priority list. Our nation's high schools are flunking badly when it comes to imbuing their students with the key elements of financial literacy.

A 2016 study by the Council for Economic Education found that 17 states require high school courses in personal finance.

That's particularly distressing when you consider that the final year of high school is, for many young people, the last great opportunity to acquire financial literacy before entering today's costly, complex and rapidly changing world.

Personal finance courses don't require teachers with advanced degrees. Almost any teacher who can balance a checkbook can follow some already successful course guidelines to impart financial basics to graduating seniors.

“To be successful, most kids don't need to learn about collateralized debt instruments, but they do need to know how to open a bank account, how much they need to save each month to reach their goals and, if they borrow this amount of money, how much money they will need to earn to pay it back,” said Nan J. Morrison, president and CEO of the Council for Economic Education, in an interview with CNBC following the report's release.

She and other personal finance advocates are responsible for many of the recent gains made in the establishment of what some call “everyday economics” in high school classrooms.

In 1998, only 14 states required that high schools give their seniors a rudimentary knowledge of personal finance. Now 37 states do, meaning more students are receiving finance lessons in their civics and math classes.

But while more states are implementing personal finance standards, the number of states that require high school students to take an actual course in personal finance — 17 — has remained unchanged since 2014, according to the study.

That's truly unfortunate. The states with the most rigorous personal finance requirements send their students on to college and into the real world with a measurable head start.

Data recently released by the Investor Education Foundation show high school students who passed mandatory personal finance courses have better-than-average credit scores and lower debt delinquency rates as young adults.

The IEF study found “notable improvements” in credit outcomes for young adults ages 18-22 in Idaho, Georgia and Texas, where financial education mandates are considered rigorous by the Council for Economic Education.

Personal finance courses provide an important leg-up to students in low-income areas with lagging schools.

A key driver of the perpetuation of poverty is that young people in economically challenged areas are often unemployed or underemployed and find themselves at the mercy of loan sharks and payday loans with stratospheric interest rates. Recent graduates in these communities find themselves struggling to pay bills and manage what little money they have.

As Morrison told CNBC: “Exposure is everything. When you learn good habits, you tend to have better outcomes.”

K. Alexander Ashe is the CEO and founder of Spendcast, a tech firm that develops finance-focused apps.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.