ShareThis Page

Russia slaps U.S.; Trump won't slap back

| Saturday, Aug. 12, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting on the ecological development of the Baikal nature site at the Baikal State Nature Biosphere Reserve in Tankhoy village, Russia. (Alexei Nikolsky, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting on the ecological development of the Baikal nature site at the Baikal State Nature Biosphere Reserve in Tankhoy village, Russia. (Alexei Nikolsky, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

Recently Vladimir Putin announced that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Russia would have to shed 755 members. Most of those, admittedly, will be local support staff; of roughly 1,200 people employed by the U.S. government in Russia, 333 are U.S. citizens and 867 are foreign nationals, most likely Russians.

So this isn't quite the mass expulsion of U.S. diplomats that was portrayed in initial news reports. It's “merely” a mass layoff of Russian workers who will now suffer because of the whims of their president.

But it's still a substantial slap at the United States — far more serious than President Barack Obama's expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats in retaliation for the Kremlin meddling in the U.S. election.

Putin's action is a sign that he has given up hope that the Trump administration will lift sanctions on Russians and otherwise conciliate the Kremlin, as Michael Flynn, who would later be named and then deposed as national security adviser, apparently hinted to the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak before the inauguration. U.S.-Russia relations, far from improving as President Donald Trump had promised, are in the depths of an icy freeze that is reviving talk of a new Cold War.

So far, Trump hasn't conceded that dismal reality. His silence suggests he remains wedded to the fantasy that Putin is an admirable leader and a potential American ally in Syria and beyond, and his long-standing affection for the Russian dictator seems to have only grown stronger after the two men spent hours bonding with one another in Hamburg.

Not a word about Russia

Just imagine if Rosie O'Donnell, “Crooked Hillary,” the “failing New York Times” or one of the president's other supposed enemies had insulted him, however slightly. He would surely have gone ballistic on Twitter by now. But there is not a word about Russia or Putin in Trump's Twitter feed, nor in his public comments, save for his ritualistic denials of any collusion between his campaign and Russia in the election.

The only official U.S. response to Putin's act was a perfunctory State Department statement saying the expulsion was “regrettable and uncalled for.” Vice President Mike Pence talked tough on Russia while in Estonia. But Trump continues his streak of never speaking ill of Putin, a streak all the more remarkable given how many other people Trump routinely disparages.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, a recipient of the Order of Friendship from Putin, also has been thunderously silent about this unwarranted affront to the department he leads.

Trump, to be sure, signed a bill imposing further sanctions on Russia but only because he had no choice — it passed both houses by veto-proof margins. The legislation removes presidential discretion to lift sanctions, an extraordinary repudiation that indicates how worried lawmakers of both parties are about this president's fondness for Russia's dictator.

Trump dragged his feet as much as possible and tried to water down the legislation. But contrary to White House claims, he did not manage to substantially alter the bill. Putin went ahead with his retaliation once the Senate and the House rejected administration entreaties to go easy on Russia.

Now the question is whether the administration will do anything at all to respond to Putin's enforced downsizing of the U.S. mission in Russia. If Trump were so inclined, there is much he could do, from slowing down the issuance of visas to Russians who want to visit the U.S., to freezing the bank accounts of Putin and his oligarch friends (it would be poetic justice to freeze 755 accounts), to adopting a Pentagon proposal to ship anti-tank missiles and other potent weaponry to the Ukrainian armed forces resisting Russian aggression.

Will Trump do any of this? Doubtful. The only anti-Russian measures he has taken are those that have been forced on him by Congress. The administration isn't hesitating to impose personal sanctions on the dictator of Venezuela, just the dictator of Russia.

Trump's fondness for Putin is the big mystery of global politics. Perhaps Trump simply admires the Russian strongman, or perhaps the Steele dossier, compiled by a former British intelligence officer, is accurate and Putin has something on Trump. Whatever the case, Trump's unwillingness to get tough with Russia saps his credibility, strengthens suspicions of collusion with the Kremlin, worries our Eastern European allies and undermines America's standing in the world.

That is a high price to pay for trying to remain in the good graces of an anti-American dictator.

Max Boot is a contributing writer to the Los Angeles Times' opinion section and is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. George F. Will is on vacation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.