ShareThis Page

Katie Pavlich: 'See Something, Say Something' update overdue

| Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, 8:55 p.m.
A man kneels Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, in front of a makeshift memorial in honor of Tuesday's victims of a bike path attack in New York. Several people were killed and others injured after a truck driver drove onto the path along New York’s Hudson River. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
A man kneels Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, in front of a makeshift memorial in honor of Tuesday's victims of a bike path attack in New York. Several people were killed and others injured after a truck driver drove onto the path along New York’s Hudson River. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

When 29-year-old Uzbekistan native Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov barreled through New York City in a rented pickup truck this week, Americans were harshly reminded of the vulnerabilities they face right here at home. Wounded by police, Saipov reportedly has zero remorse for killing eight people and severely injuring others, wishes he had done more, and even dared to ask that ISIS flags be displayed in his hospital room.

Since 9/11, as the United States has pounded terrorist cells around the world, they've adapted and their penchant for guerilla tactics has grown. “If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies,” ISIS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani said in 2014. “Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him. Do not lack.”

ISIS followers are listening. Over the past year, there have been 13 attacks by directly connected ISIS fighters and sympathizers using vehicles to mow down innocent people.

National-security and counterterrorism experts have warned that as America and its allies claim victory over ISIS in Iraq and Syria, remaining ISIS fighters will disperse into Europe and homegrown ISIS terrorists will become more prevalent in the U.S. The squeeze on the caliphate will prompt more terrorism outside its borders — right here at home instead of in faraway places. It can happen anytime, anywhere.

Government officials have warned the same. So, the question becomes: How should American citizens respond to the new threat?

After 9/11, the then-new Department of Homeland Security came up with the “If You See Something, Say Something” program for everyday citizens to report suspicious behavior they believe could be related to terrorism. In theory, the program is a great way for Americans to be engaged and vigilant in their communities, on their daily commutes, going about their business.

Unfortunately, political correctness has nearly rendered the program useless. Fears of being labeled intolerant or Islamophobic have kept good people from reporting troubling behavior.

As the threat from ISIS moves closer to home, false accusations of bigotry for the sake of politics must be removed from the conversation. Further, the government has an obligation to prepare citizens to react to attacks as they happen, and to give guidance on how to prevent them.

How do we spot suspicious behavior in this new age of terrorism? How can everyday people increase their vigilance without living in fear? How can we be more mindful of where we are in a crowd? How do we pay extra attention when walking along busy streets? When an attack occurs, how can someone in proximity respond in a way that increases survival?

The new age of “lone wolf” terrorism, with ISIS instructing followers to use everyday items to kill infidels, requires an informed and prepared citizenry. It's long past time for an updated “If You See Something, Say Something” program that leaves political correctness behind.

Katie Pavlich is news editor of TownHall.com. Her exclusive column appears on the first and third Fridays of the month.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.