ShareThis Page

Ed Feulner: Three seas, one aim: Preserving liberty

| Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
AFP | Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images
AFP | Getty Images

Nearly 30 years ago, the people of Eastern Europe were freed from the yoke of communism. Their liberation is a reminder that the Cold War didn't just end — it was won. And it was won because the ideas espoused by leaders such as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II were far stronger than any army the Soviet Union could ever field.

But eternal vigilance, as the saying goes, is the price of liberty. Freedom won can, through neglect, become freedom lost.

Which is why, since the lifting of the Iron Curtain, America has maintained a long-standing interest in Eastern Europe. President Trump has taken a personal interest in the region, and even attended the 3 Seas Initiative conference in Poland last summer.

The 3 Seas Initiative consists of 12 central and eastern European countries situated between the Baltic, Black and Adriatic Seas: Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. The aim is to strengthen trade, infrastructure, energy and political cooperation among its member-states.

It's a large area. The countries in the 3 Seas Initiative account for 28 percent of EU territory and 22 percent of its population but only 10 percent of its GDP. With the right priorities pursued by the 3 Seas countries, along with U.S. help and support, there's a lot of potential and opportunities for faster economic growth in this region.

As Trump noted during his visit: “The Three Seas Initiative will transform and rebuild the entire region and ensure that your infrastructure, like your commitment to freedom and rule of law, binds you to all of Europe and, indeed, to the West.”

The territory has been strategically important for centuries. The founder of modern geo-politics, Sir Halford Mackinder, wrote in 1919 that Eastern Europe is crucial for Europe's economic well-being and security.

There have been past attempts at aligning to this region against a common threat. In the 1920s, Polish leader Józef Piłsudski called for an “Intermarium” or a federation of states located between the Baltic and Black Seas as a balance of power against Russia and Germany.

Now, nobody is calling for these countries to unite as Piłsudski did. But the sort of multilateral regional cooperation seen today with the 3 Seas Initiative can bring huge benefits to the region — and that's good news for freedom.

Make no mistake, Trump's visit to the 3 Seas Conference was not a simple blip in U.S. foreign policy. It's part of a grander strategy for Europe. Vice President Mike Pence followed Trump's visit to Poland by traveling to Estonia, Georgia and Montenegro, affirming U.S. commitment to these countries and strengthening U.S. focus on the overall region.

The benefits are more than economic. It's in America's interest that Eastern Europe remains united in confronting the Russian threat and navigating the challenges of economic growth and energy security.

Trump's participation in the 3 Seas Initiative conference gave the effort a much-needed U.S. stamp of approval. He summed up the importance of its success in his remarks: “When your nations are strong, all the free nations of Europe are stronger, and the West becomes stronger as well. Together, our nation and yours can bring greater peace, prosperity, and safety to all of our people.”

Ed Feulner is the founder and former president of The Heritage Foundation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.