ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Remembering Officer Shaw

| Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Community members gather to pay their respects during a candlelight vigil to honor New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw in New Kensington. (Trib photo)
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
Community members gather to pay their respects during a candlelight vigil to honor New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw in New Kensington. (Trib photo)

New Kensington police Officer Brian Shaw was fondly remembered this week by more than 150 people at a vigil service for him in the parking lot of City Reach Church. Mr. Shaw, 25, was fatally shot Nov. 17 after a traffic stop. Attendees who didn't know him personally nevertheless spoke highly of his commitment to their community. And just as Mayor Tom Guzzo pointed out, what's important now in remembrance of Shaw is to honor the work of his fellow officers and first responders.

“People here know how to come together. Even after this terrible tragedy, they still work together to move forward. It's been incredible to see.”

Janelle Malloy

A vigil attendee who moved to New Kensington a month before Officer Brian Shaw was killed

“We just had to do something to show the police department, his family and the community that we support them. We really wanted to get together and make sure this was an event for everyone.”

Sarah Mortimer

One of the co-organizers of the vigil

“The community has once again really come through. We've seen the best of our community at our worst time.”

Tom Guzzo

New Kensington mayor

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me