Federalism could solve GOP branding problem
By Jonah Goldberg
Published: Tuesday, December 18, 2012, 8:45 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
To understand why Republicans have a “branding problem,” you need to understand how the system is rigged against conservatives.
Such is the schizophrenic dysfunction of our politics: We demand “conviction” politicians who will “do what's right” and then condemn them for being unwilling to put aside their conviction and their sense of what's right.
But such condemnation does not fall equally on conservatives and progressives alike. For the progressive's principle is, at its core, more. Do more. Spend more. Spend more doing more. Any compromise of progressive principle is seen as “pragmatic.” Hence, the progressive's heart is always in the right place.
The conservative, however, who says the federal government is not the right tool to fix the problem at hand, or that it is not Washington's job to fix said problem, or that such a problem is not fixable and taking money from taxpayers to try is despotic folly: This conservative's heart is never in the right place.
In other words, the progressive wins entirely on the principled question of direction. The conservative (or libertarian) loses on principle but gets concessions on how fast we'll go in the wrong direction.
The progressive says, “Let's move to Mars.” The conservative says, “Earth is fine.” They compromise by moving to the moon. And, before the first lunar dawn, the progressives start agitating about how Mars would be so much better. You can see this dynamic on full display as progressives respond to the unfolding disaster of ObamaCare by arguing for a single-payer system.
This gets to the heart of why the Republican “brand” is in such terrible shape. Over the 20th century, progressives erected a system and culture where the government in Washington is the agency of first and last resort for all of our problems.
Many conservatives argue that what the GOP needs to do is start saying “Yes” to things. As a general proposition I think this is the wrong way to go. Not only does this do violence to the constitutional order conservatives are supposed to conserve, it puts the right in a bidding war with the left about what government can and should do. Conservatives will lose that fight — and possibly their souls in the process.
What's the alternative? Well, if the game is rigged against you, continuing to play the game is the very definition of idiocy. You have to change the rules.
My own view is that conservatives should recommit themselves to federalism and states' rights. The Party of Lincoln should protect core civil rights, but beyond that, states and localities should be given as much freedom as they can handle.
Of course, conservatives already say they believe in federalism, but they rarely demonstrate it. Which brings me back to the question of principle. In principle, Republicans should look at the monumental clutter in Washington like a boat with too much ballast to stay afloat: When in doubt, throw it overboard.
In practice, Republicans should be more strategic and discriminating. That means taking positions that are right on policy, but also, when possible, highlighting issues that run counter to the (unfair) caricature of Republicans as prudish moneybags.
I'd start with federal marijuana laws. The tide has turned on pot, and states are going to keep legalizing it. Why should Washington stand in their way? It's just not Washington's fight.
This can't happen overnight, but the system didn't get rigged overnight either.
Jonah Goldberg is the author of the new book “The Tyranny of Clichés.”
- Kovacevic: It’s about time for these Penguins
- Steelers veteran outside linebacker Woodley: ‘I’m good to go’
- Steelers notebook: Slimmed-down Redman optimistic for 2013
- Senators on cusp of ouster against Penguins
- Penguins turn Game 4 into a blowout victory over the Senators
- Springdale wants retiring police chief’s help with transition
- Former Springdale police officer charged with drug possession, stealing badge
- Soldier killed on London street; terrorist suspect filmed with cleaver, knife
- North Huntingdon officials hope to spur more development
- Hampton production leads area nominations for Gene Kelly Awards
- Neal, Iginla get back on track to lead Penguins
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Jonah doesn't go far enough. The starting point for the discussion should be the Tenth Amendment (viewed with Article I, Section 8 in mind). Every power not included in Article I is "reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Nobody wants to destroy Social Security, but Republicans need to cast the public dialogue on the Constitution and where to go from there. The best way to bring this up would be to propose a Constitutional Amendment to REPEAL the Tenth Amendment. This initiative would force America to recognize that the government we are getting is decidedly NOT what the Founders had in mind. The Amendment would NEVER be passed by the state legislatures, but the discussion alone would focus peoples' attention on how far afield we have come. It would make people aware that we are not "crackpots" for advocating the de-funding of NPR, DoE, and so many other unconstitutional Federal programs.