TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Wealth sustains charities

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By John Stossel
Saturday, Dec. 29, 2012, 8:04 p.m.
 

Charity — helping people who have trouble helping themselves — is a good thing two times over. It's good for the beneficiary and good for the donor, too.

Stephen Post's fine book, “The Hidden Gifts of Helping,” reveals that 76 percent of Americans say that helping others is what makes them most happy. Giving money makes us feel good, and face-to-face helping is even better. People say it makes them feel physically healthier.

Private charity is unquestioningly better than government efforts to help people. Government squanders money. Charities sometime squander money, too, but they usually don't.

Proof of the superiority of private over government efforts is everywhere. Catholic charities do a better job educating children than government — for much less money. New York City's government left Central Park a dangerous mess. Then a private charity rescued it. But while charity is important, let's not overlook something more important: Before we can help anyone, we first need something to give. Production precedes donation. Advocates of big government forget this.

We can't give unless we (or someone) first creates. Yet wealth creators are encouraged to feel guilt. “Bill Gates, or any billionaire, for that matter — how did they become a billionaire? By creating a product or great service that benefits everybody,” Yaron Brook, author of “Free Market Revolution” and president of the Ayn Rand Institute, said on my TV show.

Gates walks in the footprints of earlier creators, such as John D. Rockefeller, who got rich by lowering the price of oil products, and Cornelius Vanderbilt, who did the same for transportation. The clueless media called them “robber barons,” but they were neither robbers nor barons.

They and other creators didn't just give us products to improve our lives; they also employed people. That's charity that keeps on giving, because employees keep working and keep supporting their families. “That's not charity,” Brook said. “(It's) another trade. You pay your employees and get something in return. But the employee is better off, and you are better off.”

Brook points out that Gates gets credit for his charity, but little credit for having created wealth. “Quite the contrary,” Brook said. “We sent the Justice Department to go after him. He's considered greedy, in spite of all the hundreds of millions of people he's helped, because he benefited at the same time. (When) he shifted to charity, suddenly he's a good guy. My complaint is not that he's doing the charity. It's that we as a society value not the creation, not the building, not the accumulation of wealth. ... What we value is the charity.”

What especially offends Brook, and me, too, is stigmatizing wealth creators. The rich are made to feel guilty about making money.

I sometimes attend “lifetime achievement award” ceremonies meant to honor a businessman. Inevitably, the recipient's charity work is celebrated much more enthusiastically than his business creation. Sometimes the businessman says he wants to “give back.”

Says Brook, “It's wrong for businessmen to feel like they need to ‘give back' as if they took something away from anybody.”

He's right. They didn't.

If we value benevolence, we must value creation.

John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of “No They Can't: Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed.”

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Court lets stand ruling for Beaver County widow whose house was auctioned over $6.30 late fee
  2. Plum High School teacher held for court on charges of intimidation
  3. Westmoreland park police probe report of man who grabbed woman from Twin Lakes trail
  4. Philadelphia U.S. Rep. Fattah indicted in racketeering case
  5. USW workers to march on ATI headquarters
  6. Rossi: ‘Hockey guy’ Sutter will be missed
  7. School credit ratings a problem for several in Western Pennsylvania
  8. Steelers’ Wheaton adjusting his game moving to slot receiver
  9. Kang’s 9th-inning home run gives Pirates wild victory over Twins
  10. Thief’s attorney blames Rivers Casino; judge isn’t swayed
  11. Driver accused of crashing head-on into Ligonier officer’s SUV waives right to preliminary hearing