| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Wealth sustains charities

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

By John Stossel
Saturday, Dec. 29, 2012, 8:04 p.m.

Charity — helping people who have trouble helping themselves — is a good thing two times over. It's good for the beneficiary and good for the donor, too.

Stephen Post's fine book, “The Hidden Gifts of Helping,” reveals that 76 percent of Americans say that helping others is what makes them most happy. Giving money makes us feel good, and face-to-face helping is even better. People say it makes them feel physically healthier.

Private charity is unquestioningly better than government efforts to help people. Government squanders money. Charities sometime squander money, too, but they usually don't.

Proof of the superiority of private over government efforts is everywhere. Catholic charities do a better job educating children than government — for much less money. New York City's government left Central Park a dangerous mess. Then a private charity rescued it. But while charity is important, let's not overlook something more important: Before we can help anyone, we first need something to give. Production precedes donation. Advocates of big government forget this.

We can't give unless we (or someone) first creates. Yet wealth creators are encouraged to feel guilt. “Bill Gates, or any billionaire, for that matter — how did they become a billionaire? By creating a product or great service that benefits everybody,” Yaron Brook, author of “Free Market Revolution” and president of the Ayn Rand Institute, said on my TV show.

Gates walks in the footprints of earlier creators, such as John D. Rockefeller, who got rich by lowering the price of oil products, and Cornelius Vanderbilt, who did the same for transportation. The clueless media called them “robber barons,” but they were neither robbers nor barons.

They and other creators didn't just give us products to improve our lives; they also employed people. That's charity that keeps on giving, because employees keep working and keep supporting their families. “That's not charity,” Brook said. “(It's) another trade. You pay your employees and get something in return. But the employee is better off, and you are better off.”

Brook points out that Gates gets credit for his charity, but little credit for having created wealth. “Quite the contrary,” Brook said. “We sent the Justice Department to go after him. He's considered greedy, in spite of all the hundreds of millions of people he's helped, because he benefited at the same time. (When) he shifted to charity, suddenly he's a good guy. My complaint is not that he's doing the charity. It's that we as a society value not the creation, not the building, not the accumulation of wealth. ... What we value is the charity.”

What especially offends Brook, and me, too, is stigmatizing wealth creators. The rich are made to feel guilty about making money.

I sometimes attend “lifetime achievement award” ceremonies meant to honor a businessman. Inevitably, the recipient's charity work is celebrated much more enthusiastically than his business creation. Sometimes the businessman says he wants to “give back.”

Says Brook, “It's wrong for businessmen to feel like they need to ‘give back' as if they took something away from anybody.”

He's right. They didn't.

If we value benevolence, we must value creation.

John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of “No They Can't: Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed.”

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Rossi: Just wait until Ben comes back
  2. Steelers notebook: Tomlin dismisses clock run-off near end of Chargers game
  3. Pa., W.Va., Ohio to coordinate efforts to attract shale-related business
  4. Tomlin on Bell’s late TD: ‘We were going to go for it’
  5. Water leak under Banksville Road doesn’t bode well for commuters
  6. Washington County woman dies from shotgun wound
  7. Steelers defense displays resiliency in victory over Chargers
  8. Pittsburgh considering self-insured health benefits to cut costs
  9. Marshals apprehend man suspected in Clairton machete attack
  10. Penguins notebook: Young and old embrace uniqueness of home opener
  11. A farewell party for the Greenfield Bridge, then the headaches that follow