TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

False alarms on amnesty

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

By Steve Chapman
Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

To hear opponents tell it, you don't want to be standing along the U.S. border when an immigration reform bill becomes law. Millions of foreigners who were previously content in their native lands will pack a bag and storm across the U.S. border, trampling anyone unlucky enough to be in the way.

The reason, we are told, is a change that Republicans have previously rejected but Democrats and Latino groups see as indispensable: a procedure for illegal immigrants to become legal residents and, eventually, citizens. Critics call it “amnesty” and say it will spur illegal immigration as surely as emptying the jails would generate crime.

The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) said it is a recipe for “effectively unlimited future illegal immigration.” Back in 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed a bill that eventually allowed 3 million unauthorized foreigners to become legal — and in the following years, there was a surge of unapproved arrivals.

CIS Executive Director Mark Krikorian has said the amnesty option would resemble the experience of Bill Murray in the film “Groundhog Day” — repeating an unwanted experience “over and over again.”

The fears, however, are largely groundless. In the first place, the legalization program is not so generous as to lure hordes of Mexicans and other foreigners who have so far resisted the temptation to steal across the border. It would let undocumented migrants stay here on a probationary basis only after they pass a background check and pay a fine as well as back taxes.

So getting legal status won't be cheap or quick. Under the senators' proposal, those migrants yearning for U.S. citizenship would have to wait another decade or even two. It's amnesty only for the patient.

The alarmists also forget how much the world has changed since 1986. It's a mistake to blame the amnesty for the rise in illegal immigration that followed. It was due far more to a couple of other factors, according to Edward Alden, a researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations.

The first was a demographic bulge caused by Mexico's high birth rate: In 1960, the average Mexican woman had seven children. Today, the figure is down to nearly two.

Another difference is the difficulty of getting here. “Border security is vastly more robust than before,” Alden told me. Over the past two decades, he says, the number of Border Patrol agents has soared from 3,000 to 21,000, while 700 miles of fencing has been erected on our southern border.

Back then, walking in undetected was hard only if you had trouble walking. Today, the chances of arrest are high. Fewer people take the risk these days. Despite having far more personnel, the Border Patrol apprehended fewer people in 2011 than in any year since 1972.

Lots of the undocumented came here legally as students or tourists and overstayed their visas. But the 9/11 attacks brought stricter checks and new controls on many foreigners coming here legally. Any comprehensive immigration measure won't ease those requirements. In fact, the senators insist on new steps to assure that those who come from abroad legally leave when their time is up.

But the critics are right: If illegal immigrants gain a path to legal status and citizenship, the change is likely to evoke “Groundhog Day.” In the movie, every day begins the same way. What changes is what happens next. In the end, remember, they live happily ever after.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Sestak kicks off U.S. Senate campaign — with a couple missteps
  2. Court rules Steelers must pay Okobi workers comp
  3. 11 Ligonier Township residents rescued by boat from floodwaters
  4. Westmoreland historical society holding antiques appraisal
  5. Police: Suspect in 1970 cold case homicide of 17-year-old dies days before charges filed
  6. Export steel pipe supplier announces new jobs
  7. Penguins need trade-deadline acquisitions to bring toughness
  8. Owner of Strip District nightclub Ivy agrees to close after shooting
  9. Blue Jays’ Martin has ‘nothing but praise’ for former Pirates teammates
  10. Elizabeth Township, McKeesport impacted by ice jam on Youghiogheny River
  11. Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules