TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


False alarms on amnesty

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | RSS | Mobile


By Steve Chapman

Published: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Updated: Wednesday, February 20, 2013

To hear opponents tell it, you don't want to be standing along the U.S. border when an immigration reform bill becomes law. Millions of foreigners who were previously content in their native lands will pack a bag and storm across the U.S. border, trampling anyone unlucky enough to be in the way.

The reason, we are told, is a change that Republicans have previously rejected but Democrats and Latino groups see as indispensable: a procedure for illegal immigrants to become legal residents and, eventually, citizens. Critics call it “amnesty” and say it will spur illegal immigration as surely as emptying the jails would generate crime.

The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) said it is a recipe for “effectively unlimited future illegal immigration.” Back in 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed a bill that eventually allowed 3 million unauthorized foreigners to become legal — and in the following years, there was a surge of unapproved arrivals.

CIS Executive Director Mark Krikorian has said the amnesty option would resemble the experience of Bill Murray in the film “Groundhog Day” — repeating an unwanted experience “over and over again.”

The fears, however, are largely groundless. In the first place, the legalization program is not so generous as to lure hordes of Mexicans and other foreigners who have so far resisted the temptation to steal across the border. It would let undocumented migrants stay here on a probationary basis only after they pass a background check and pay a fine as well as back taxes.

So getting legal status won't be cheap or quick. Under the senators' proposal, those migrants yearning for U.S. citizenship would have to wait another decade or even two. It's amnesty only for the patient.

The alarmists also forget how much the world has changed since 1986. It's a mistake to blame the amnesty for the rise in illegal immigration that followed. It was due far more to a couple of other factors, according to Edward Alden, a researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations.

The first was a demographic bulge caused by Mexico's high birth rate: In 1960, the average Mexican woman had seven children. Today, the figure is down to nearly two.

Another difference is the difficulty of getting here. “Border security is vastly more robust than before,” Alden told me. Over the past two decades, he says, the number of Border Patrol agents has soared from 3,000 to 21,000, while 700 miles of fencing has been erected on our southern border.

Back then, walking in undetected was hard only if you had trouble walking. Today, the chances of arrest are high. Fewer people take the risk these days. Despite having far more personnel, the Border Patrol apprehended fewer people in 2011 than in any year since 1972.

Lots of the undocumented came here legally as students or tourists and overstayed their visas. But the 9/11 attacks brought stricter checks and new controls on many foreigners coming here legally. Any comprehensive immigration measure won't ease those requirements. In fact, the senators insist on new steps to assure that those who come from abroad legally leave when their time is up.

But the critics are right: If illegal immigrants gain a path to legal status and citizenship, the change is likely to evoke “Groundhog Day.” In the movie, every day begins the same way. What changes is what happens next. In the end, remember, they live happily ever after.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman.

Most Popular Stories

  1. Steelers hope new blocking scheme kick-starts running game
  2. NHL commissioner Bettman talks Crosby, Olympics, outdoor games
  3. Penguins insider: Golden opportunity arrives with Game 5
  4. Senators' Alfredsson clarifies comments made after Game 4
  5. Starkey: Pens’ offense blazing historic path
  6. Steelers notebook: Gilbert hopes to stay on left side of O-line
  7. Seattle-area bridge collapse caused by oversize load
  8. Pens will unveil even bigger TV screen for fans in Game 5
  9. Boy Scouts of America to drop ban on gay Scouts
  10. Pirates notebook: Melancon relishes rare save opportunity
  11. Pirates beat Cubs, 4-2, to finish homestand with sweep
You must be signed in to add comments

To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.